Sunday Poster Session
Category: Colon
Ibrahim Mohammed, MD (he/him/his)
Albany Medical Center
Waterbury, CT
In May 2025, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating real-time AI use during colonoscopy. We included studies that compared AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard or non-AI colonoscopy and reported adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), or adenoma miss rate (AMR). Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data independently, resolving conflicts by consensus.
Results: We screened 2,152 studies and included 119 that met our criteria, comprising 72 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 25 prospective studies, and 19 retrospective studies. All studies involved the real-time application of AI during colonoscopy and compared outcomes with standard or non-AI-assisted colonoscopy. The majority of studies evaluated CAD-EYE (66 studies), followed by custom AI models (35), GI Genius (10), and other systems including Endoangel and Endoaid. Across studies, 93 (78%) demonstrated statistically significant improvement in adenoma detection rate (ADR) with AI, while 18 studies (15%) showed no significant difference. An additional 4 studies reported improvement in polyp detection rate (PDR) without ADR benefit, and 4 studies focused on adenoma miss rate (AMR), all showing reductions in missed lesions with AI assistance. Reported ADRs ranged from 4.5% to 84.97% in AI-assisted groups versus 0.28% to 80% in control groups. Multiple tandem and multicenter trials confirmed that AI can enhance detection even among expert and high-performing endoscopists, with particularly notable gains in lower baseline detection settings. No study reported worse performance with AI.
Discussion: Across a range of systems, the use of real-time AI during colonoscopy continuously enhanced adenoma detection. These results provide credence to the use of AI to improve quality and lower miss rates. The long-term outcomes should be evaluated in future research.
Figure: Figure 1. Impact of real-time AI on detection outcomes in included studies. The majority of studies reported statistically significant improvements in adenoma detection rate (ADR), while a smaller number reported improvements in polyp detection rate (PDR) or adenoma miss rate (AMR) alone.
Figure: Figure 2. Distribution of AI systems used across included studies. CAD-EYE and custom-built AI models were the most frequently evaluated platforms, followed by GI Genius, Endoangel, and other systems.
Disclosures:
Ibrahim Mohammed indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Yehya Maitah indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Shamayel Safdar indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Zarbakht Nisar indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Cade Kelleher indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Osama Alshakhatreh indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Mahima Gill indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Mohammed Mohammed indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Seth Richter indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Ibrahim Mohammed, MD1, Yehya Maitah, 1, Shamayel Safdar, MBBS1, Zarbakht Nisar, MBBS1, Cade Kelleher, MD1, Osama Alshakhatreh, MD1, Mahima Gill, DO1, Mohammed Mohammed, 2, Seth Richter, MD, FACG1. P0269 - Real-Time Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review, ACG 2025 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. Phoenix, AZ: American College of Gastroenterology.